Abstract
From ancient times to 19th century geometry symbolized the essence of mathematical thinking and method, but modern philosophy of mathematics seems to have marginalized the philosophical status of geometry. The roots of this transformation will be sought in the ascendance of logical foundations in place of intuitive primacy as the cornerstone of mathematical certainty in the late 19th century. Nevertheless, geometry and geometrical thinking, in multiple manifestations, have continued to occupy a central place in the practice of mathematics proper. We argue that this, together with advances in the neuroscience of mathematical processes, calls for an expansion of the present limited remit of the philosophy of mathematics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Amalric, M., & Dehaene, S. (2016, May 3). Origins of brain networks for advanced mathematics in expert mathematicians. PNAS, 113(18), 4909–4917.
Aristotle. (2001). The basic works of Aristotle. In R. McKeon (Ed.). New York: Modern Library.
Biagioli, F. (2019). Ernst Cassirer’s transcendental account of mathematical reasoning. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2019.10.001.
Birkhoff, G. D. (1968). Collected mathematical papers (Vol. 3). New York: Dover.
Brouwer, L. E. J. (1975). Collected works (Vol. 1). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Dedekind, R. (1963). Essays on the theory of numbers. New York: Dover.
Demopoulos, W., & Clark, P. (2007). The logicism of Frege, Dedekind and Russell, in Shapiro (2007, pp. 129–165).
Descartes, R. (1954). Geometry. New York: Dover.
Ewald, W. (1996). From Kant to Hilbert: A source book in the foundations of mathematics (Vols. 1–2). Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Ferreiros, J. (2007). Labyrinth of thought (2nd revised ed.). Basel: Birkhäuser.
Ferreiros, J., & Gray, J. J. (2006). The architecture of mathematics. Oxford: OUP.
Franks, C. (2009). The autonomy of mathematical knowledge: Hilbert’s program revisited. Cambridge: CUB.
Frege, G. (1980). Philosophical and mathematical correspondence. Oxford: Blackwell.
Grattan-Guinness, I. (1980). From calculus to set theory: 1630–1910. Princeton: PUP.
Hilbert, D. (1990). Foundations of geometry. LaSalle, IL; Open Court.
Hilbert, D., & Cohn-Vossen, S. (1952). Geometry and imagination. New York: Chelsea.
Jaffe, A., & Quinn, F. (1994, January). Theoretical mathematics: Toward a cultural synthesis of mathematics and theoretical physics. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(1). Responses: Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society, 30(2), April 1994.
Kant, E. (1998). Critique of pure reason (trans. P. Guyer & A. Wood). Cambridge: CUB.
Laugwitz, D. (1999). Bernhard Riemann 1826–1866: Turning points in the conception of mathematics. Basel: Birkhäuser.
Manin, Yu. (2000). Mathematics and metaphor. Providence, RI: Amer. Math. Soc.
Poincaré, H. (2001). The value of science: Essential writings of Henri Poincaré. New York: Modern Library.
Rashed, R. (1994). The development of arabic mathematics: Between arithmetic and algebra. Dordrecht: Springer-Science + Business Media, B.V.
Reck, E. H. (2013). Frege or Dedekind: Towards a reevaluation of their legacies. In E. H. Reck (Ed.), The historical turn in analytic philosophy. London: Palgrave-Macmillan.
Russell, B. (1956). An essay on the foundations of geometry. New York: Dover.
Russell, B. (1996). The principles of mathematics. New York: Norton.
Scholz, E. (1982). Herbart’s influence on Bernhard Riemann. Historia Mathematica, 9, 413–440.
Shapiro, S. (2007). The Oxford handbook of: Philosophy of mathematics and logic. Oxford: OUP.
Shipley, J. (2015). Frege on the foundations of geometry in intuition. Journal of the History and Analysis of Philosophy, 3(6), 1–19.
Spivak, M. (1979). A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry (Vol. 2). Boston: Publish or Perish.
Tappenden, J. (1995). Geometry and generality in Frege’s philosophy of arithmetic. Synthese, 102, 319–361.
Tappenden, J. The Riemannian background to Frege’s philosophy, in Ferreiros and Gray (2006, pp. 97–132).
Wagner, R. (2017). Making and breaking mathematical sense. Princeton: PUP.
Acknowledgement
The author thanks anonymous referee for helpful comments.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Shahshahani, S. (2021). The Curious Neglect of Geometry in Modern Philosophies of Mathematics. In: Mojtahedi, M., Rahman, S., Zarepour, M.S. (eds) Mathematics, Logic, and their Philosophies. Logic, Epistemology, and the Unity of Science, vol 49. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53654-1_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-53654-1_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-53653-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-53654-1
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyMathematics and Statistics (R0)